Organizational Behavior This essay answers the following three questions: 1)Â Compare Mr. Meyersonâ€™s leadership style versus Mr. Perotâ€™s based on the Michigan and Ohio state behavioral theories of leadership. 2) Utilizing Fiedlerâ€™s Contingency Theory of leadership, explain how either Meyersonâ€™s or Perotâ€™s style might be most appropriate based on specific characteristics of the situation at Perot Systems. 3) Evaluate the situation at Perot Systems from the point of view of the discussion on New Leadership. Employee centered supervisors are those who place strong emphasis on their concerned with getting the work done. Sometimes, the more general terms human relations oriented and task oriented are used to describe these alternative leader behaviors. Consideration and initiating structure are highly considerate leader is sensitive to peopleâ€™s feelings, and much like the employee centered leader, tries to make things pleasant for his or her followers. In contrast, a leader high in initiating structure is more concerned with defining task requirements and other aspects of the work agenda; he or she might be seen as similar to a production-centered supervision. Meyersonâ€™s concern was emphasis on profit at the expense of people. He believed that technology, customers, the market, and what people in organizations wanted from their work had all changed his previous times at EDS. Meyerson wanted to move Perot Systems toward a co...
History questions - Essay Example Abraham Lincoln told â€œenemy is at your door, wait not to meet him at your hearthstone, meet him at the doorsill, and drive him from the temple of liberty, or pull down its pillars and involve him in a common ruinâ€ (McPherson 212). This should be considered as evidence that our country is not safe anymore. Abraham Lincoln also mentioned that he thoroughly disliked to comment on the various tactics employed by historical leaders who played an instrumental role in earlier wars. Government always must be â€œof the people, by the people and for the peopleâ€ and victory always must be â€œan anti slavery triumphâ€ (McPherson 218). Jefferson Davis strongly disagreed on excessive individualism that were ruling the states. He pointed out that this kind of extreme individualism wonâ€™t bring any good to the state. Instead, it will only create neglect towards teamwork. He also emphasized that â€œwar meant itâ€™s for all and not for singleâ€. This means, war is always for a group of people and not for a single person. He told â€œeach state has the right of revolutionâ€ (McPherson 240). Political revolution or any kind of revolution always placed the state in a crucial, authoritative position and the right of revolution is for everyone. 2. If as Mr. Sparks contends what is Past is prologue, there is much in the Civil War Era that is relevant to your lives today. Please provide 3 examples of how a study of The Civil War helps you understand the United States in 2010. If a civil war breaks out in the Unites States in 2010, it, will, perhaps mark the end of this country. There would be violence, bloodshed, riots and insurgencies all over the country, leading to loss of millions of human lives as well as the ultimate breakdown of the countryâ€™s vast social and economic infrastructure. A study of the civil war has helped us to understand the
Write something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview.